INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
Why Holistic Approach towards Drainage is Important
Introduction
Retaining walls are critical components in civil and geotechnical engineering, especially in terrains with significant elevation changes. While structural strength is vital, long-term performance depends heavily on proper drainage design. In Australia, where diverse soil types and climate conditions pose unique challenges, adopting a holistic approach to drainage in retaining wall design is not just good practice—it's essential.
What Does a "Holistic Approach" Mean?
A holistic approach to retaining wall design means integrating structural, geotechnical, hydrological, and environmental considerations into a unified system. It extends beyond traditional engineering by:
- Addressing surface and subsurface water movement:
- Anticipating long-term soil-water interaction:
- Integrated Structural and Geotechnical Design:
This comprehensive 3-step viewpoint ensures that the wall remains safe, functional, and environmentally responsible over time
The Role of Drainage in Retaining Wall Design:
Water is the silent threat behind most retaining wall failures. When water accumulates behind a wall, it increases hydrostatic pressure, reducing stability and increasing the risk of:
- Wall rotation
- Sliding at the base
- Erosion of backfill
- Structural cracking
A well-designed drainage system reduces these risks by allowing controlled water escape, thereby preserving the integrity of the wall structure.
Drainage Requirements Under AS 4678: What the Code Says
According to AS 4678, retaining walls must include provisions for drainage to prevent build-up of water pressure behind the wall. Key requirements include:
- Use of free-draining granular material immediately behind the wall.
- Inclusion of weep holes, perforated drainpipes, or geo-composite drainage layers to relieve hydrostatic pressure.
- Geotextile filter layers to prevent soil fines from clogging the drainage media.
- Consideration of potential adverse effects on nearby land or structures, especially on sloping ground where excavation may trigger or worsen slope instability.
- Surface water diversion from the top or toe of the retaining wall to prevent ponding behind the wall or entry into the subsurface drainage system.
- The design must consider the long-term condition of the drainage system, including potential, partial or complete failure, rather than relying solely on its initial performance.
Clause 3.2.5 of AS 4678 specifically notes the importance of controlling hydrostatic pressure through proper drainage design, particularly for walls over 800 mm in height or supporting critical structures.
Case Study: Observed Retaining Wall Distress in NSW, Australia:
The highlighted case in Western Sydney , underscores the critical importance of incorporating proper drainage in retaining wall design. In this case, the retaining wall was constructed without appropriate measures to control and divert surface water runoff, resulting in water accumulation and ponding into the adjacent property ’s founding soil, undermining the founding soil critical for pier support. After just one year, we have already detected minor deflections, variegated settlement patterns, and early signs of foundation movement. Seasonal rainfall will only worsen the situation. Although no catastrophic failure has occurred, the observed deterioration suggests an increased risk of future instability if corrective measures are not adopted immediately.
Holistic Approach: Layer-by-Layer Analysis
Let’s break down how a holistic approach, as advocated in engineering design and AS 4678:2002, could have prevented or mitigated these issues:
- Limited Integration of Drainage in Design Phase
A major flaw in the original design was the failure to incorporate essential drainage elements, which lead to:
- Uncontrolled Water Flow over Retaining Wall:
The image shows muddy water flowing directly over a retaining wall from the upper property. This suggests that rainwater or surface runoff is not being redirected through a proper drainage system. Instead, it is spilling over the edge, carrying soil with it. - Erosion Stains and Soil Loss:
The retaining wall is visibly stained with streaks of mud and water, indicating repeated and uncontrolled flow. The soil from the upper lawn is being washed down, contributing to erosion and potential weakening of the retaining structure at the toe end of the wall. - Absence of Drainage Outlets
No drainage swales or dish drains are observed along the top of retaining wall. This absence allows for water to carve its own weaker paths for over the land flows and ponding and softening the founding soil enabling rotational movement of galvanized steel post.
Recommendation:
- Integrating Simple Drainage Solutions into Wall Design
A basic surface drainage solution, such as a dish drain positioned at the top of the wall, complemented by strategically located stormwater pits, could have effectively redirected runoff and significantly reduced the impact of these issues. This highlights the importance of approaching the wall design as part of a broader hydrological network rather than a stand-alone structure.
- Design Accountability: A Lesson from Failure
This case study highlights a common issue in construction projects: drainage and erosion defects trigger a blame game among the builder, designer, and contractor, delaying resolution. In the meantime, the retaining wall suffers continued deterioration, leaving the owner to shoulder the significant expense of remedial works.
Collaboration Over Isolation in Complex Terrains
This underscores the critical need for integrated planning from the project's outset. Had site gradients, stormwater management, and retaining wall performance been addressed holistically—with cross-disciplinary collaboration—we likely would have avoided these failures.
Effective systems hinge on a cohesive approach, not fragmented efforts, especially where complex topography and phased development intersect.
Conclusion:
This case reminds us that retaining wall design goes beyond soil retention—it demands water management, soil mechanics, and real-world planning. A holistic drainage strategy, mindful of phased development and evolving topography, secures long-term functionality and protects adjacent properties.
This isn’t a critique of any individual or practice, but a call to address common industry oversights, centre our work on the asset owner, and honour our ethical duty as structural experts to deliver safe, sustainable projects in Australia.
Related Articles

Future-Proofing Construction: The Long-Term Value of Preventative Engineering
